Best Performances of 2018

In an age of special effects and ever expanding budgets, solid performances are what sets many movies apart. They carry the emotional weight of a movie and have the ability to make you laugh or cry or cry from laughing. These are the very best actors and actresses from this past year.


This year had some familiar faces in new territory. Daniel Kaluuya broke out last year in the hit Get Out, and his resume continues to grow with a villain turn in Widows. Ethan Hawke plays a somber priest who begins to spiral out of control when confronting some of the evils of the world in First Reformed. Another Get Out alum in Lakeith Stanfield got a star turning role in Sorry to Bother You, as a telemarketer who begins to see through the facade of the corporate world. Michael B. Jordan brought some heart to an other despicable Kilmonger in Black Panther.

But the best performance of the year comes in the form of Christian Bale playing Dick Cheney in Vice. Bale again had a dramatic weight gain and the results were stunning. Initially, I was unsure how Bale could ever look like Cheney, but the two become almost indistinguishable. But the similarities did not stop at the looks. Bale nailed the diction of the former Vice President, and gave him some heart that the man himself might not even deserve.


The ladies had some A-plus performances as well. Stephanie Germanotta (aka Lady Gaga) delivered a powerful first performance in A Star is Born, as a struggling artist looking for her big break. Claire Foy, star of Unsane, plays a woman who may or may not be suffering from a mental break, and shows all the anxiety and fear that such a situation would bring. Emma Stone plays a servant looking to expand her role within Queen Anne's court in The Favourite. And Elsie Fisher breaks out in Eighth Grade, a harrowing look into the terrors of middle school in this decade.

Toni Collette is my female performance of the year for her role in Hereditary. Starring as the mother of a family of four, Collette begins the movie grieving over the death of her own mother, and could be described as in various states of depression throughout the film. Without going into spoilers, the last 30 minutes of the movie have some of the best and most terrifying images from the year, with Collette providing many of the scares herself. If you missed Hereditary, I would definitely recommend checking it out if you can handle horror movies.

Top 5 Action Movies 2018

Action movies thrill, excite, and get your adrenaline pumping. Some are award worthy, others are filled with cheesy one liners, and some are the perfect mix of both.

Honorable Mentions:
5. Den of Thieves
The most macho movie on the list, Den of Thieves is by no means a great movie, but it has some solid set pieces and a classic hard broiled cop in Gerard Butler. The story follows a group of criminals as they attempt to rob the United States treasury. It goes to some obvious places but still has some tense scenes. Currently on demand.
4. The Night Comes for Us

The most blood soaked entry on the list, this movie follows a gangland enforcer who refuses to kill a child who witnesses one of his gang’s crimes. The gang decides to send its members after the enforcer, leading to some of the greatest action scenes since The Raid. The pure insanity on display with the hand-to-hand combat looks stunning and the choreography is incredibly precise. Currently streaming on Netflix.
3. Sicario: Day of the Soldado

Not as good a movie as the original but might be a better action movie than its predecessors. Day of the Soldado follows Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro as they continue to work around the US/Mexico border. Gone is the broodiness of the predecessor and it is replaced with guns, gore, and explosions. Currently streaming on major platforms.
2. AvengersInfinity War

The beginning of the conclusion for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Infinity War features team ups and beat downs previously only seen in comic books and imaginations. While some of the storylines don’t pan out, the sheer spectacle of watching the mightiest heroes take on Thanos as he swiftly defeats them in Wakanda is worth the price of admission alone. Currently streaming on Netflix.
1. Mission Impossible: Fallout

After Tom Cruise hung off the side of an airplane in Rogue Nation, many people wondered how he would top it. He responded by doing a halo jump and learning to fly a helicopter in order to have a dogfight over the mountains. Cruise continues to show why he is the top action actor of our time. And I haven’t even touched on Henry Cavil’s glorious mustache. Currently streaming on major platforms.

Top 5 Horror Movies 2018

Some horror movies make you jump in your seat. Others haunt your dreams for a few nights after viewing. But the very best have the ability to stick with you for years to come and make you rethink parts of your everyday life. These are the very best horror movies that came out in 2018.

Honorable Mentions:


5. Summer of ‘84
We are living in the peak time of nostalgia for the 1980s. From Stranger Things to It, the pop culture lexicon is filled with movies and TV shows attempting to recreate the feel of that era. Summer of ’84 was a criminally underseen movie from this past year that does a great job of mimicking the feel of the ‘80s, as well as create tension for the protagonist, who is convinced his cop next door neighbor is a serial killer. Currently streaming on Shudder.
4. Mandy
In terms of insanity, Mandy ranks top of the list. If Nicolas Cage fighting ghouls with a medieval battle ax doesn’t get you excited, I am not quite sure what will. Cage seeks revenge against a cult who attacks him and his wife. This movie is pretty far out there, so a casual film fan may not go for it, but genre fans will definitely find something to seek their teeth into with this one. Currently streaming on Shudder.
3. Overlord
Inglorious Basterds meets Edge of Tomorrow, this schlocky good time provides just the right amount of horror and action. A group of allied soldiers dropped deep in Nazi territory have one mission: destroy a radio tower within a church. But what awaits them behind the steeple doors is a lot scarier than they initially expected. Loads of blood and gore ensue. Currently in a limited number of theaters.
2. Hereditary
A24 knocks it out of the park again with a familial drama that quickly descends into darkness. After losing her mother, a woman learns terrifying secrets about her past that will change her family line forever. First time director Ari Aster knocks it out of the park by providing scares that do not necessarily make you jump in your seat but will stick in your mind for a long time. Currently available to purchase on all major platforms.
1. Unsane
Steven Soderberg and Claire Foy teamed up to create one of the most personal horror experiences of the year. Unsettling and unnerving, Unsane was shot entirely on iPhone, leading the viewer feeling trapped along with Foy’s character. In the movie, a woman is attempting to escape and overcome her stalker, but ends up accidently checking into a mental institution, which her stalker may or may not have infilitrated.

Aquaman

     Aquaman is directed by James Wan and stars Jason Momoa, Amber Heard, and Patrick Wilson. It tells the story of Arthur Curry, a half-man and half-Atlantean hybrid who seeks to bring peace between his two worlds before the surface world is destroyed.
     The DCEU has had its fair share of misses without a critical hit. While Justice League is one of the most misguided entries into its filmography, Aquaman stood as one of the highlights in an otherwise terrible movie. So, the prospect of a solo film gave me some hope for the future of the extended universe, if it only be brief glimpse of it.
     The biggest compliment that I could give Aquaman is that it is the most like a Marvel movie that DC has made. From bright and vibrant colors to familial politics, Aquaman feels like a distant relative of Justice League in its color palette and that is for the best. Many of the action scenes are well lit and the camera fluidly moves throughout the space, rather than quickly cutting from one shot to the next. But even these action scenes rely on quite a bit of CGI, rather than stunt choreography. 
     Momoa brings grit and hardness to a character that had often been the punchline of jokes prior to this iteration of Aquaman. I believed he could take on any of the various villains he is put up against. But even the toughness of Momoa cannot cut through the absurdity and cringe of the dialogue in the script. I found myself laughing during some of the more serious moments of the movie because of the ridiculous nature of the lines. One example involves a particular character demanding to be called “Ocean Master” rather than king. While I understand the writers presumably wanted to distance themselves from the ultra-serious tones of Batman v SupermanMan of Steel, and Justice League, perhaps a slightly less campy take would have done the script some good.
     This movie has no business being almost two and a half hours long. Some films justify their length, but Aquaman begins to drag quite a bit. And some of the scenes and characters would be better suited for a sequel (looking at you Black Mantis). A tighter and slightly more serious runtime and script would have done this movie quite a bit of good.
     At the end of the day, Aquaman is far from the worse entry into the DCEU do to its visuals and Jason Momoa’s portrayal of the titular character. I never actively hated what I was watching but I did not quite love anything either. Aquaman is a campy and, ultimately, a forgettable entry into the DCEU.

When should you watch it?
Redbox

Widows

     Widows is directed by Steve McQueen and stars Viola Davis, Michelle Rodriguez, and Colin Farrell. It tells the story of a group of widows, who must come up with a large sum of money that their dead husbands stole.

     Steve McQueen is one of the best directors working today, having won an Oscar for his work on the film 12 Years a Slave. But that movie came out almost 7 years ago, and he hadn't come out with a feature film since. Widows was near the top of my list for most anticipated of the year, so I was very excited to finally get a chance to watch it.

     Widows shines through the strength of the performances and the technical craft on display. Each widow gets her chance to shine, but Michelle Rodriguez was surprisingly the strongest of the female leads. Having only seen her in Fast and Furious movies beforehand, the range on display and the vulnerability she showed really shocked me. But the stand out performance of the movie came from last year's breakout star, Daniel Kaluuya. He plays the brother/hitman for Jamal Manning, a local politician trying to win the Alderman position. The menace Kaluuya shows brought chills every time he was on the screen. The innocence he showed in Get Out quickly disappears from the moment he steps on screen. I would not be surprised if he is up for an award at the end of this year.

     McQueen again shows why he is a master of his craft through this technical showcase. The opening of the film splits between an intimate moment between husband and wife and a bank robbery going horribly wrong. This helps to show that even through the more bombastic moments of the movie, the director still wants to focus on the humanity within his characters. One of the standout scenes includes a three minutes long shot outside of a limo. The car starts in a low income predominately African-American neighborhood and moves into a middle class predominately white neighborhood in this short amount of time. Without the use of cuts, the viewer begins to realize just how close the worlds are, despite the perceived differences of how they live.

     But Widows was not without its share of issues. One issue I had with the movie was the lack of closure. A lot of plot threads were left dangling as credits rolled. I would have liked to see where some of the stories ended up, and could have used an extra 25 minutes or so with these characters.

     Not necessarily an issue but more personal preference, I felt as though the political race underlying the heist of the movie was more compelling and engaged me more as a viewer. Without getting too far into it, much of the movie focuses on a Chicago race for a vacated Alderman seat. Much of the politics and dirty dealing made for quite an exciting time, even if it was not what I had initially signed up for.

     Widows is a very solid piece of filmmaking, with some great performances and technical marvels. But at the end of the day I was hoping for a little more heist and a little less political drama, even if the political drama was the more inspired piece of filmmaking.

When should you see it?
Wait a Week

Bad Times at the El Royale

Bad Times at the El Royale is written and directed by Drew Goddard and stars Jeff Bridges, Cynthia Erivo, and Dakota Johnson. It tells the story of a fateful night at the El Royale, a motel located on the border of California and Nevada. Seven strangers, each with layered backstories, are given a final shot at finding redemption.
Drew Goddard found fame with the hit horror-comedy Cabin in the Woods. It was a clever send-up of the slasher films of old by adding new twists to what seemed like a straight forward affair. His second directorial effort sees him channeling his best Quentin Tarantino impression, for better and for worse. 
Bad Times… shines in the first act, when suspense and mystery meet characters with intriguing backstories. A sequence occurring about midway through the first act involving two-sided mirrors leaves the audience on the edge of their seat. Character motivations are revealed, and actions are seen that set up potentially great payoffs for later on in the movie. 
In a film with great performances from powerhouse actors Jeff Bridges and John Hamm, the true star of the movie is Cynthia Erivo. 
Erivo stars as a former Motown singer who could not make it in the industry. This movie marks Erivo’s feature film debut and just might be a star turning role for the former Broadway performer. Her singing is used throughout the soundtrack and provides the backdrop for the best sequence in the movie.
The main problems with Bad Times… start about midway through the movie. After a shocking twist, the movie begins to peter out. The arrival of a bizarre performance from Chris Hemsworth does little in answering the questions from the first half of the movie. His entire storyline feels tacked on.
The feel of a Tarantino movie shines with the dialogue and unique characters. But it hinders it with its blood lust and excessive runtime. By the end of the movie, character deaths had no emotional weight. People were being killed for shock value alone. And the runtime of 2 hours and 22 minutes began to drag on as the potentially great payoffs often times revealed themselves to be empty.
Bad Times at the El Royale is not a bad movie. Fans of Quentin Tarantino or pulpy crime films will have a lot of fun with it. But the average movie going audience may feel just as I did; Bad Times… settles for average when it had the potential for greatness. 

When should you see it?
Dollar Theater

Ant-Man and the Wasp


Ant-Man and the Wasp is directed by Peyton Reed (Ant-Man) and stars Paul Rudd (I Love You, Man), Evengeline Lilly (Lost), and Walton Goggins (The Hateful Eight). It tells the continued adventures of Scott Lang, as this time he must fight with Hope Van Dyne, aka The Wasp, to figure out secrets from the past.

The best part about Ant-Man and the Wasp are the action set-pieces. While Marvel films may not get everything right, they sure do know how to stage action. The car chases especially were fascinating because of the growing and shrinking powers that the heroes possess. The other cool thing was the laboratory, which had a remote that allowed it to grow and shrink with the push of the button. This made for some interesting special effects as the building would simply appear out of almost nowhere.

But perhaps the biggest problem with the movie is the best thing about it is the special effects. On an actor’s side, Michelle Pfeiffer (Batman Returns) stood out, but she was not given nearly enough to do. Paul Rudd was also pretty good, albeit a little too smug at times. The rest of the actors I could take or leave. None of them did anything overly impressive but they also were not horribly offensive either.

Marvel’s villain problem continues, this time in the form of Ghost. Her motivations are unclear, and I never really understood what the actress was going for. The film almost does not even need the villain in the first place, as defeating her is not the drive of the protagonists. 

In an age of Black Panther and Infinity War, Ant-Man and the Wasp feels outdated. The stakes of the MCU feel too high at this point for side quests with characters who are not even considered Avengers. While nothing in the movie is overly offensive and you probably will enjoy your time at the theater, the film is ultimately forgettable and leaves you wondering when the more important stuff is going to return.

When should you see it?
Dollar Theater

Drive

I am currently taking a film class while in college, and one of our assignments was to analyze the types of shots that a director uses to explain a deeper meaning about the film. So I wrote about 2000 words about the Nicolas Winding Refn film Drive. Hope you enjoy.


Image via IMDB


     The 2011 Nicolas Winding Refn film Drive is noteworthy for its attention to its action sequences and brutal violence. Although the move is called Drive, the titular action ironically does not often occur. But this does not stop the chase sequences from being enthralling. The limited amount of time behind the wheel gives a sense of realism to the action.

     There are two main car chase sequences in the film. Both scenes follow a constructive editing technique. No establishing shot gives the exact location, forcing the viewer to remain an active participant. The urban environment of the opening scene makes the driver get creative within his environment. Staying within the car makes long shots more difficult and are seen only from the driver’s point of view. The second scene is primarily long shots, yet always keeps the cars within those shots. Both of the scenes give the viewer less to work with, making him or her work harder to fully comprehend what is happening.

     The opening shot of the movie is a close-up of the main character’s face, known simply as the Driver. He is on the right third of the screen, with half of his face in the dark and half of his face in the light. The opening lighting shows the internal battle between the good and evil sides within the driver. The next shot is a medium shot showing the car’s interior with its passenger. The camera then cuts to a long shot from the driver’s point-of-view of a man running out of an electronics store. The ensuing chase intercuts between the driver’s face close-up, medium shots of the backseat, and long shots of the road from the driver’s point-of-view. The close-ups are used to show how the driver’s face never changes despite the long shots showing perilous situations. The robbers who are his passengers are shown in medium reaction shots. While the driver remains stoic even with the cops closing in, the robbers’ reaction shows that things may not be going exactly as they had hoped. The long shots of the urban environment are shot from both the front and back of the car to give an immersive experience into what the characters themselves are actually seeing. The camera never leaves the inside of the car. Staying within the car makes the entire sequence more immersive than a more standard chase. We are left with the point-of-view of the driver as he must navigate through the streets intercut with reaction shots as different obstacles are presented to him. The chase ends with a medium close-up showing the driver as he exits the car. It tracks him through a parking garage and into the streets. Even though he has this criminal side to him, he is able to blend in with a crowd and escape into the night.


Image via IMDB

     A car chase that occurs following a mix-up sees the driver the new owner of close to one million dollars, although he is unaware of the real amount. The scene begins in a similar manner as the first, focusing on the driver. As he looks out the window, the viewer is given a point-of-view shot showing Standard exit a building. It holds on him as someone shoots, startling the always in control driver. A reaction shot reveals that the driver was not ready for this sequence of events. A medium shot sees the driver get out of the car to try and give assistance to Standard, who is then shot in the chest. This sequence immediately gives the impression the driver has lost control of the situation. By beginning the scene in the same way as the first scene, the viewer is given the impression the driver is still in control. But as soon as things are out of his hands, he leaves the place of control, the inside of the car.

     This sets off the second car chase. This sequence differs from the first because it does not remain inside the car with the driver. Having the camera outside of the car gives the impression the driver is less in control and has less precision than the first chase. The average shot length lasts for around three seconds. This allows the action to flow naturally and show that the driving stunts are real, not on a sound stage or green screen. Although he is less in control, close-up reaction shots show the driver is still focused on the job at hand. Medium shots from the interior of the car have Blanche reacting in a much different way, giving the viewer someone whom they can relate to. The scene ends on a close-up of the other driver’s tire after he crashes, showing the driver was successful in evading from the capture. As this shot fades away, a high-angle close-up shows a stack of money. This helps to clear up any confusion over the motivation of the car chase because of how abrupt the chase began.


Image via IMDB

     Because of the driver’s ability to maneuver around other cars, he does not experience much violence on the road. But when presented with a threat to his love, Irene, he does not shy away from doing whatever is necessary to protect her. This is shown in a scene taking place within an elevator and within a strip club. These areas are not normally associated with violence, yet the most brutal scenes of the film are staged within these confines.

     The brutality within the elevator is accentuated by the romance preceding it. The elevator scene begins with a medium shot showing three characters, Irene, the driver, and an antagonist known simply as ‘Tan Suit’, as the elevator doors close. It then cuts to a low angle shot of Tan Suit. The low angle gives him a sense of power. It immediately follows with a shot from the same angle of the driver. Both shots have Irene in the foreground, but not in focus. The next shot starts with a close-up of Tan Suit’s face, and it pans down his body remaining with a close-up as it reveals a gun at his waist. It then cuts back to the same low angle shot of the driver before cutting to a medium shot of the driver and Irene, as he pulls her behind him and turns around to look at her. The screen is then filled with a medium shot of the driver and Irene’s body and then pans up to a medium shot from the shoulders up of Irene and the driver. This shot lasts for forty seconds as the two passionately kiss. The medium shot lasts in total for sixty-two seconds. The kiss lasts for so long because it is the first time the two are able to physically act on their emotional impulses.

     But the romantics are quickly replaced by brutal violence. The next shot is three-shot that follows the rule of thirds. Irene is on the right third and Tan Suit on the left third. All three characters’ heads are on the upper third. Irene moves forward in the frame but remains on her third. By following the rule of thirds, Refn is able to make the small space feel larger. A close-up of the two fighting follows. It then cuts to a reaction shot of Irene as she sees the violence taking place. It cuts back to a close-up of the two fighting and the camera pans down with Tan Suit as the driver pushes him to the floor. It then cuts back to a medium reaction shot of Irene. The camera cuts back to Irene during this sequence because it is her introduction to this side of the driver’s life. It then cuts to a canted shot of Tan Suit as he lays on the floor and gets kicked in the head. The canted shot shows the confusion of Tan Suit because of his inability to fight back. Next, an over the shoulder shot shows the driver begin to stomp. It then cuts to an extreme low angle shot of the driver as he angrily stomps. The different angle of the shots shows the shifts in position of power. The first low angle shot is of Tan Suit, who we assume to be in control of the situation. But at the end of the scene, the victorious driver is given the same angle treatment. A quick POV shot shows the aftermath of his outburst.

     It then cuts back to a reaction shot of Irene, revealing the horror she has from uncovering this side of the driver. The camera goes back to a low angle shot of the driver.  Then back to a reaction shot of Irene as she slowly backs out of the elevator. Irene is unable to act because of the brutality she just witnessed. The shot ends with her completely out of the frame. The next shot is from Irene’s POV and is a medium shot of the driver’s back as he turns around. The next shot is a plain Americana of Irene as she looks on in horror. It then cuts back to a medium shot of the driver. Then back to the plain Americana of Irene. This shot lasts slightly longer and sees the elevator doors close between the two. The closing of the elevator door signifies the barrier the violence has put between the two. The scene ends with a close-up of the back of the driver’s jacket.


Image via IMDB


     An outburst of violence also occurs in a strip club, as the driver must get the names of the men he must eliminate to secure safety for himself and Irene. The scene starts with a long shot of the interior of a staircase inside the back of the club. The camera moves towards the driver as the driver walks towards the camera. He stops at a medium shot before turning down a hallway. The camera pans with the driver and then stops as he walks down the hallway. It then turns into a medium shot from the driver’s chest to his knees, revealing he is holding a hammer. This reveal of the hammer shows the intentions of the driver within the strip club. It cuts to a long shot of a green room with multiple half naked women and their Chris, one of Nino’s associates. 

     The driver enters from the left side of the screen, moving right. The next cut is a high angle shot over the driver confronting Chris with a hammer. It then cuts to a plan américain of the driver as he stands over Chris. It then is another high angle shot from behind the driver. It then cuts to a close-up of the driver holding the hammer directly against Chris’s head. It then cuts to a canted, close-up of the driver’s face. The next shot is of a high angle over the driver’s shoulder. It is followed by a long shot of the driver kneeling over Chris surrounded by the women. Despite Chris being the boss of the women, none of them feel inclined to help him. It then cuts to a low angle close-up of the driver’s face. It then intercuts high angle shots of Chris with low angle shots of the driver. The angled shots mirror the previously mentioned scene. They once again show who holds the power and the helplessness of the victim of the driver’s actions. The driver gets what he wants, a phone call with Nino, which ends this series of shots. The next shot is of a plan américain the driver stands over Chris and talks on the phone with Nino. This signifies the power of the driver and how he got what he wanted out of Chris.


Pacific Rim: Uprising

Image via IMDB

     Pacific Rim: Uprising is directed by Steven S. Knight (Daredevil) and stars John Boyega (The Force Awakens), Cailee Spaeny, and Scott Eastwood (The Fate of the Furious). It picks up 10 years after the original, this time focusing on Stacker Pentecost's son, Jake, as the Kaiju threat emerges after all assumed they were merely a thing of the past.
     The original Pacific Rim was a fun, enjoyable movie that I remember almost nothing about. When I heard a sequel had come out, I knew I would get around to seeing it but had no desire to rewatch the original. One of the major problems with this sequel is that I think many people have nostalgic feelings for the original, when in reality it is a pretty standard action film.
     The best part of the movie is the action sequences. It made some innovative choices that I did not see coming. The opening chase scene was fun and quickly reintroduced us to the world of Yaegers. The attention to detail on the Yaegers' suits impressively showcased a wide range of different alien killing machines.
     The performances, for the most part, were underwhelming. Boyega has always felt a bit overrated in my opinion but still has some decent emotional moments. If Scott Eastwood never acted in another movie, I would be a happy person. His timing never feels right and that goes far beyond just this movie. The best performance was from Cailee Spaeny, who made her big screen debut. Her character could have been the annoying kid role, but she made choices that set her apart from the rest of the cast.
     The biggest problem with the movie are the awful attempts at comedy. One liner after one liner falls flat and makes you question why they paid somebody to sit down and write this movie. While the climax is fun, the exact machinations of what is happening makes you scratch your head and wonder "Is this even possible?" A question probably best left unasked throughout this runtime.
     Overall, I am not exactly sure when the first film suddenly became high art. I always viewed it as disposable blockbuster fun and this movie is just as expendable. This best way to watch this is with your mind turned off and a big bowl of popcorn.

When should you see it?
Redbox

Quick Reviews: Love Simon, Death Wish, When We First Met

Image via IMDB

Love, Simon is directed by Greg Berlanti (Life as We Know It) and stars Nick Robinson (Jurassic World), Jennifer Garner (Daredevil), and Josh Duhamel (Transformers). It tells the story of Simon Spier, who's secret, being gay, threatens to unravel his life during his senior year of high school.

+ Genuine heart
+ Family dynamic
+ Funny lines

- Leans too heavily on tropes of romantic comedies
- Unbelievable antagonist
- Cheesy

When should you see it?
Dollar Theater

Image via IMDB

Death Wish is directed by Eli Roth (Hostel) and stars Bruce Willis (Die Hard), Vincent D'Onofrio (Full Metal Jacket), and Dean Norris (Breaking Bad). It tells the story of Dr. Paul Kersey, who takes the law into his own hands after he is unable to protect his family from a group of violent home invaders.

+ Creative kills
+ Bruce Willis

- Terrible pacing
- Cringeworthy line delivery
- Questionable character decisions

When should you see it?
Cable

Image via IMDB

When We First Met is directed by Ari Sandel and stars Adam Devine (Pitch Perfect), Alexandra Daddario (True Detective), and Robbie Amell (The DUFF). It tells the story of a man who continually time travels back in order to convince the woman he loves to fall for him.

+ Adam Devine
+ Interesting premise

- "Comedy" without laughs
- Predictable to a T
- Premise never fully realized

When should you see it?
Cable

Game Night


     Game Night is co-directed by John Francis Daley (Vacation) and Jonathan Goldstein (Vacation) and stars Jason Bateman (Horrible Bosses), Rachel McAdams (Mean Girls), and Jesse Plemons (Breaking Bad). It tells the story of a group of friends, who's regular game night is thrown out of a whack through a series of increasingly crazy events based around a potentially real murder mystery.
     Last year was abysmal in terms of comedy movies. Aside from the underrated and Chance the Rapper approved The House and slightly overrated but nevertheless fun Girls’ Trip, nothing of the other comedies gave me more than a slight chuckle.
     So, the first big comedy of the new year, aside from the latest 50 Shades of Grey, had me nervous but hopeful. The cast had some hits under their belts (Horrible Bosses, New Girl, Breaking Bad, Mean Girls) but the directors only helmed one movie previously, Vacation, which I won’t even comment on in this review.
     Game Night lands squarely in the middle of recent comedies, never quite reaching belly laugh level but never having me regret the decision to watch it. Positives include Jesse Plemons of Breaking Bad fame, who gave a great performance as a lonely security guard. Establishing shots felt like they were on an actual board game, giving the movie a unique feel. I never thought I would comment on the establishing shots, but the building of scenes from the opening frame helped this Game Night feel like an actual game.
     But at a certain point the twists and turns go from fun to futile. Just as the movie feels like it is going up a ladder, the next plot reveal goes right down a chute. I am still not sure I could completely explain each ending, not because I missed something but because so much happened.
     This comedy was a fun, if ultimately unmemorable, time. If you need to spend an hour and fourty-five minutes doing something, I could think of quite a few worse ways to do. The subjectivity of comedy makes it difficult to know how it will affect you personally, but I enjoyed my time with Game Night.

When should you watch it?

Dollar Theater